I recently visited the Chester Arnold exhibit at the Nevada Museum of Art. I was very taken by the size and beauty of his work. Arnold’s attention to detail is almost unfathomable. Some of his paintings almost look like photographs. I was mostly moved by the mine paintings, of the three pieces shown from 1996, I was drawn to “On Earth as it is in Heaven.” My Grandfather was a coal miner for over twenty years, and upon viewing these paintings, I felt closer to him.
The description of this painting mentioned Arnold’s religious intellectual awakenings, and how he now, basically, views religious narratives as creative opportunities. I find inspiration in religion as well; iconography is a huge part of my body of work. For me, art has to mean something, to tell a story or evoke human emotion. What is more intriguing than heaven and hell?
Looking more closely at this painting, beyond the composition and color, which draws one in. The brush strokes are not very impressive, almost thrown on the canvas in contempt. Especially when looking at “Grubstake” 2008, painted twelve years later. The brushstrokes seem to have more intent, or respect. I would like to know if this was intentional or simple technical growth.
I respect Arnold and his views on subject matter that have such a major impact on modern life. The environment and the effects humans have had on it. It would be amazing if work like this had the impact on modern civilization that it needed to.
describe Grubstake more in detail. One of the pieces, you need to research further (book or internet) and develop an assumption of what the piece means based on your research.
ReplyDelete